Review



fbp reconstruction technique  (Philips Healthcare)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Philips Healthcare fbp reconstruction technique
    Images acquired at 140 kVp and 4.0 mGy reconstructed with a filtered back projection <t>(FBP),</t> b iDose 4 level 4, and <t>c</t> <t>IMR</t> level 2 with the use of O-MAR. Lower noise values and improved overall image quality can be observed in images reconstructed with IMR level 2 compared with FBP and iDose 4
    Fbp Reconstruction Technique, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fbp reconstruction technique/product/Philips Healthcare
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fbp reconstruction technique - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction"

    Article Title: Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction

    Journal: Skeletal Radiology

    doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2580-2

    Images acquired at 140 kVp and 4.0 mGy reconstructed with a filtered back projection (FBP), b iDose 4 level 4, and c IMR level 2 with the use of O-MAR. Lower noise values and improved overall image quality can be observed in images reconstructed with IMR level 2 compared with FBP and iDose 4
    Figure Legend Snippet: Images acquired at 140 kVp and 4.0 mGy reconstructed with a filtered back projection (FBP), b iDose 4 level 4, and c IMR level 2 with the use of O-MAR. Lower noise values and improved overall image quality can be observed in images reconstructed with IMR level 2 compared with FBP and iDose 4

    Techniques Used:

    Reference CT numbers, signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs), and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNRs) for filtered back-projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction iDose 4 (levels 2, 4, and 6), and iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR; levels 1, 2, and 3) at CT dose indexes (CTDI vol ) of 40.0, 32.0, 24.0, 16.0, 8.0, and 4.0 mGy at 120 and 140- kVp without the influence of metal artifacts. Reference values were determined by averaging values of the unaffected pellets L0, L4, R0, and R4
    Figure Legend Snippet: Reference CT numbers, signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs), and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNRs) for filtered back-projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction iDose 4 (levels 2, 4, and 6), and iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR; levels 1, 2, and 3) at CT dose indexes (CTDI vol ) of 40.0, 32.0, 24.0, 16.0, 8.0, and 4.0 mGy at 120 and 140- kVp without the influence of metal artifacts. Reference values were determined by averaging values of the unaffected pellets L0, L4, R0, and R4

    Techniques Used:

    Images acquired at 140 -kVp and CDTI vol of 24.0 mGy reconstructed with a FBP, b FBP + O-MAR, c iDose 4 level 4, d iDose 4 level 4 + O-MAR, e IMR level 2, and f IMR level 2 + O-MAR. IMR level 2 and O-MAR results ( f ) show the least noise with reduced metal artifacts compared with conventional FBP and iDose 4 reconstructions
    Figure Legend Snippet: Images acquired at 140 -kVp and CDTI vol of 24.0 mGy reconstructed with a FBP, b FBP + O-MAR, c iDose 4 level 4, d iDose 4 level 4 + O-MAR, e IMR level 2, and f IMR level 2 + O-MAR. IMR level 2 and O-MAR results ( f ) show the least noise with reduced metal artifacts compared with conventional FBP and iDose 4 reconstructions

    Techniques Used:

    A 24.0-24.0 mGy (instead of 24.0-mGy)mGy acquisition at 140 - kVp reconstructed with a FBP and b iDose 4 level 4. c A 4.0-4.0 mGy (instead of 4.0-mGy)mGy acquisition at 140- kVp reconstructed with IMR level 2 and O-MAR. IMR and O-MAR results in c show a clearly improved image quality with reduced metal artifacts compared with a and b reconstructed with FBP and iDose 4 , while reducing radiation dose by 83%
    Figure Legend Snippet: A 24.0-24.0 mGy (instead of 24.0-mGy)mGy acquisition at 140 - kVp reconstructed with a FBP and b iDose 4 level 4. c A 4.0-4.0 mGy (instead of 4.0-mGy)mGy acquisition at 140- kVp reconstructed with IMR level 2 and O-MAR. IMR and O-MAR results in c show a clearly improved image quality with reduced metal artifacts compared with a and b reconstructed with FBP and iDose 4 , while reducing radiation dose by 83%

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    fbp reconstruction technique  (Philips Healthcare)
    90
    Philips Healthcare fbp reconstruction technique
    Images acquired at 140 kVp and 4.0 mGy reconstructed with a filtered back projection <t>(FBP),</t> b iDose 4 level 4, and <t>c</t> <t>IMR</t> level 2 with the use of O-MAR. Lower noise values and improved overall image quality can be observed in images reconstructed with IMR level 2 compared with FBP and iDose 4
    Fbp Reconstruction Technique, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/fbp reconstruction technique/product/Philips Healthcare
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fbp reconstruction technique - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Images acquired at 140 kVp and 4.0 mGy reconstructed with a filtered back projection (FBP), b iDose 4 level 4, and c IMR level 2 with the use of O-MAR. Lower noise values and improved overall image quality can be observed in images reconstructed with IMR level 2 compared with FBP and iDose 4

    Journal: Skeletal Radiology

    Article Title: Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction

    doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2580-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Images acquired at 140 kVp and 4.0 mGy reconstructed with a filtered back projection (FBP), b iDose 4 level 4, and c IMR level 2 with the use of O-MAR. Lower noise values and improved overall image quality can be observed in images reconstructed with IMR level 2 compared with FBP and iDose 4

    Article Snippet: All scans were reconstructed with FBP, iDose 4 and IMR with and without O-MAR (Philips Healthcare). iDose 4 can be used at seven different levels of noise reduction where levels 2, 4, and 6 were chosen.

    Techniques:

    Reference CT numbers, signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs), and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNRs) for filtered back-projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction iDose 4 (levels 2, 4, and 6), and iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR; levels 1, 2, and 3) at CT dose indexes (CTDI vol ) of 40.0, 32.0, 24.0, 16.0, 8.0, and 4.0 mGy at 120 and 140- kVp without the influence of metal artifacts. Reference values were determined by averaging values of the unaffected pellets L0, L4, R0, and R4

    Journal: Skeletal Radiology

    Article Title: Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction

    doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2580-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Reference CT numbers, signal-to-noise-ratios (SNRs), and contrast-to-noise-ratios (CNRs) for filtered back-projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction iDose 4 (levels 2, 4, and 6), and iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR; levels 1, 2, and 3) at CT dose indexes (CTDI vol ) of 40.0, 32.0, 24.0, 16.0, 8.0, and 4.0 mGy at 120 and 140- kVp without the influence of metal artifacts. Reference values were determined by averaging values of the unaffected pellets L0, L4, R0, and R4

    Article Snippet: All scans were reconstructed with FBP, iDose 4 and IMR with and without O-MAR (Philips Healthcare). iDose 4 can be used at seven different levels of noise reduction where levels 2, 4, and 6 were chosen.

    Techniques:

    Images acquired at 140 -kVp and CDTI vol of 24.0 mGy reconstructed with a FBP, b FBP + O-MAR, c iDose 4 level 4, d iDose 4 level 4 + O-MAR, e IMR level 2, and f IMR level 2 + O-MAR. IMR level 2 and O-MAR results ( f ) show the least noise with reduced metal artifacts compared with conventional FBP and iDose 4 reconstructions

    Journal: Skeletal Radiology

    Article Title: Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction

    doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2580-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Images acquired at 140 -kVp and CDTI vol of 24.0 mGy reconstructed with a FBP, b FBP + O-MAR, c iDose 4 level 4, d iDose 4 level 4 + O-MAR, e IMR level 2, and f IMR level 2 + O-MAR. IMR level 2 and O-MAR results ( f ) show the least noise with reduced metal artifacts compared with conventional FBP and iDose 4 reconstructions

    Article Snippet: All scans were reconstructed with FBP, iDose 4 and IMR with and without O-MAR (Philips Healthcare). iDose 4 can be used at seven different levels of noise reduction where levels 2, 4, and 6 were chosen.

    Techniques:

    A 24.0-24.0 mGy (instead of 24.0-mGy)mGy acquisition at 140 - kVp reconstructed with a FBP and b iDose 4 level 4. c A 4.0-4.0 mGy (instead of 4.0-mGy)mGy acquisition at 140- kVp reconstructed with IMR level 2 and O-MAR. IMR and O-MAR results in c show a clearly improved image quality with reduced metal artifacts compared with a and b reconstructed with FBP and iDose 4 , while reducing radiation dose by 83%

    Journal: Skeletal Radiology

    Article Title: Low-dose CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopedic metal artifact reduction

    doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2580-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A 24.0-24.0 mGy (instead of 24.0-mGy)mGy acquisition at 140 - kVp reconstructed with a FBP and b iDose 4 level 4. c A 4.0-4.0 mGy (instead of 4.0-mGy)mGy acquisition at 140- kVp reconstructed with IMR level 2 and O-MAR. IMR and O-MAR results in c show a clearly improved image quality with reduced metal artifacts compared with a and b reconstructed with FBP and iDose 4 , while reducing radiation dose by 83%

    Article Snippet: All scans were reconstructed with FBP, iDose 4 and IMR with and without O-MAR (Philips Healthcare). iDose 4 can be used at seven different levels of noise reduction where levels 2, 4, and 6 were chosen.

    Techniques: